On pyramid technology, people and Gods in myth and history. The likely methodology of a progenitor race.

 

The Site of Zawyet El Aryan is recounted as an unfinished pyramid. In close proximity to Giza, the chain of pyramids is deliberate in constructive design, set over the water concourses underground.

Here at Zawyet El Aryan as classed ‘an unfinished pyramid’, the first stage build is discerned, by which we can attribute the pyramid builder’s primary designer function in the pyramid, as access to the underground tributary (See Source : https://youtu.be/fwycGS8pExM)

Is there more to this story? More to the location and chain of sites linking the tributary system underneath Giza? Besides the matter of exactly how the pyramid functioned in generating energy[i]. For on the incredible fact that an ancient society managed an ecologically friendly powerplant for the purposes of harvesting fish en mass, we have numerous theories contending that the regional placement was essential.

First let’s consider the historical records of Egypt, concerning the Gods, an anthropomorphism related directly to the intelligible entities on our megalithic planar state. Further the duality in Egyptian and Greek myth is essential for us, in comparison to Sumerian myth, which all pertain to again in accounting for realist devising by the all-powerful creators which is seemingly beyond the comprehension of mere mortal homo sapien sapiens.

Our fundamentals to begin the inquiry are;

1. The Seven anti-deluvian sages Led by Oannes. The ‘fish-garbed figures
2. Enki is depicted in fish garb and/or with wings
3. The ‘temple’ in Abados, the City of Osiris' aquatic features

Relating to genealogical standards and that shared by our hypothetical sub-species Homo Sapien Sapien, in relation to the traditions of fishing there is a firm set of assumptions we can make. Trade of fish was potentially coordinated for the class-based social functions depicted by either winged humans, fish-garbed figures, and or establishing a social order organised particularly to feeding populations. Also conferring that a set of deities pertained to harness nature to provide fish to the people freely, en mass; the loss of this ability which confers the need for fishing sets course in absolution for the anthropomorphism which follow the genealogical traditions.

These are (which following the destruction of the megalithic periodic capacities of fish farming at Giza);

1)      The killing of the Gods and their followers

2)      The sub sequential apocalypsis, and necessity of barbarity in hunting

3)      Justification of suffering as conferred by the sub-racial state

Gods Reconsidered

The work by Berossus describing Babylonia, the ‘Apkallu’ - Sage, describes fish-men who are sent by the gods to impart knowledge to people. In Berossus, the first one Oannes (a variant of Uanna) is said to have taught people the creation myth the Enuma Elis. There are strictly seven sages or the seven kings who attained human-status from Gods in later myth;

Uanna, "who finished the plans for heaven and earth",

Uannedugga, "who was endowed with comprehensive intelligence",

Enmedugga, "who was allotted a good fate",

Enmegalamma, "who was born in a house",

Enmebulugga, "who grew up on pasture land",

An-Enlilda, "the conjurer of the city of Eridu",

Utuabzu, "who ascended to heaven".

This myth in reconsideration can detail how a society was affixed and accustomed to receiving ample fish from the city’s wells, as executed by the geomantic power of the pyramid. Also, that the divine right associated by this freedom as so ordained allowed or liberated perhaps further necessities. We could confer many natures to this line of thought, and Greek myth ascertains that the father of the Gods frequently intervened in earthly affairs, breeding with earth-women. The root structure of Sumerian myth also diverges on this course in the descending of gods who taught the people what they knew.

We need to accept the certain facts that relate to the loss of social status from the megalithic society to the post-flood society and so reemergent in Sumeria, Greece and Egypt to clarify this inquiry. That is actually less pertaining to the passing of knowledge, in the matter of significant loss, and as inferred by a necessity of basic survival skills/knowledge of civilisation. The frequent depiction of these demi-gods with a carry pot/bag suggests and into modern Buddhist/Hindu traditions, that a class was set aside to enforce the burden of such necessity. That is, these Godly men would receive alms rather than toil the land, and hunt prey. In this respect the barrier between God and Man wasn’t collapsed completely, rather those now smitten to toil for survival, as was mankind after the flood when accounting for the Megalithic society, had the boon of ‘public’ servants, there by granted, ready and able to impart extraneous knowledge of the world, functional change and profession. The reference to the outside world per say for those embroiled in the duties of a household. Meanwhile the men would take on identity with the treasured food regular folk couldn’t easily obtain. The Apkallu’s birded figure so in identifying the animal not of the water domain which is best fit and capable of fishing, does by the crueller measure prolong suffering.

The re-Engineering of greatness; a Gods Myth

Lastly, we should reconsider those closest to our constructed progenitors in a Megalithic Society, who may well have been rejected in a violent apocalyptic revolution or may peacefully have departed for Peru only to be bred out with Homo Sapiens. Any number of hypothesis confer what transpired between 14,000 and 12,000 years ago at the demise of Gobekli Tepe. But, Osiris and Isis the semblance of civility are mythically identified with bringing back the brilliance of the Gods with Maat, ⲙⲉⲉ/ⲙⲉ "truth, justice", the cosmic and social order. This is an ideal line of inquiry based on the pyramid texts in which we should distinguish influences of dynastic Egypt from Megalithic fact.

---

[i] The involvement of the Ionosphere in the process of power generation forms the fundamental difference to a strictly geomantic structural foundation with local amplification of electro-magnetic frequencies.