The Site of Zawyet El
Aryan is recounted as an unfinished pyramid. In close proximity to Giza, the
chain of pyramids is deliberate in constructive design, set over the water
concourses underground.
Here at Zawyet El Aryan as classed ‘an unfinished pyramid’,
the first stage build is discerned, by which we can attribute the pyramid
builder’s primary designer function in the pyramid, as access to the
underground tributary (
See Source : https://youtu.be/fwycGS8pExM)
Is there more to this story? More to the location and chain
of sites linking the tributary system underneath Giza? Besides the matter of
exactly how the pyramid functioned in generating energy
[i].
For on the incredible fact that an ancient society managed an ecologically
friendly powerplant for the purposes of harvesting fish en mass, we have
numerous theories contending that the regional placement was essential.
First let’s consider the historical records of Egypt,
concerning the Gods, an anthropomorphism related directly to the intelligible
entities on our megalithic planar state. Further the duality in Egyptian and
Greek myth is essential for us, in comparison to Sumerian myth, which all
pertain to again in accounting for realist devising by the all-powerful
creators which is seemingly beyond the comprehension of mere mortal homo sapien
sapiens.
Our fundamentals to
begin the inquiry are;
1. The Seven anti-deluvian sages Led by Oannes. The
‘fish-garbed figures
2. Enki is depicted in fish garb and/or with wings
3. The ‘temple’ in Abados, the City of Osiris' aquatic features
Relating to genealogical standards and that shared by our
hypothetical sub-species Homo Sapien Sapien, in relation to the traditions of
fishing there is a firm set of assumptions we can make. Trade of fish was
potentially coordinated for the class-based social functions depicted by either
winged humans, fish-garbed figures, and or establishing a social order organised
particularly to feeding populations. Also conferring that a set of deities
pertained to harness nature to provide fish to the people freely, en mass; the
loss of this ability which confers the need for fishing sets course in
absolution for the anthropomorphism which follow the genealogical traditions.
These are (which following the destruction of the megalithic
periodic capacities of fish farming at Giza);
1)
The killing of the Gods and their followers
2)
The sub sequential apocalypsis, and necessity of
barbarity in hunting
3)
Justification of suffering as conferred by the
sub-racial state
Gods Reconsidered
The work by Berossus describing Babylonia, the ‘Apkallu’ -
Sage, describes fish-men who are sent by the gods to impart knowledge to
people. In Berossus, the first one Oannes (a variant of Uanna) is said to have
taught people the creation myth the Enuma Elis. There are strictly seven sages or
the seven kings who attained human-status from Gods in later myth;
Uanna,
"who finished the plans for heaven and earth",
Uannedugga,
"who was endowed with comprehensive intelligence",
This myth in reconsideration can detail how a society was
affixed and accustomed to receiving ample fish from the city’s wells, as
executed by the geomantic power of the pyramid. Also, that the divine right
associated by this freedom as so ordained allowed or liberated perhaps further
necessities. We could confer many natures to this line of thought, and Greek
myth ascertains that the father of the Gods frequently intervened in earthly
affairs, breeding with earth-women. The root structure of Sumerian myth also
diverges on this course in the descending of gods who taught the people what
they knew.
We need to accept the
certain facts that relate to the loss of social status from the megalithic
society to the post-flood society and so reemergent in Sumeria, Greece and
Egypt to clarify this inquiry. That is actually less pertaining to the passing
of knowledge, in the matter of significant loss, and as inferred by a necessity
of basic survival skills/knowledge of civilisation. The frequent depiction of
these demi-gods with a carry pot/bag suggests and into modern Buddhist/Hindu
traditions, that a class was set aside to enforce the burden of such necessity.
That is, these Godly men would receive alms rather than toil the land, and hunt
prey. In this respect the barrier between God and Man wasn’t collapsed
completely, rather those now smitten to toil for survival, as was mankind after
the flood when accounting for the Megalithic society, had the boon of ‘public’
servants, there by granted, ready and able to impart extraneous knowledge of
the world, functional change and profession. The reference to the outside world
per say for those embroiled in the duties of a household. Meanwhile the men
would take on identity with the treasured food regular folk couldn’t easily
obtain. The Apkallu’s birded figure so in identifying the animal not of the
water domain which is best fit and capable of fishing, does by the crueller
measure prolong suffering.
The re-Engineering of
greatness; a Gods Myth
Lastly, we should reconsider those closest to our
constructed progenitors in a Megalithic Society, who may well have been
rejected in a violent apocalyptic revolution or may peacefully have departed for
Peru only to be bred out with Homo Sapiens. Any number of hypothesis confer
what transpired between 14,000 and 12,000 years ago at the demise of Gobekli
Tepe. But, Osiris and Isis the semblance of civility are mythically identified
with bringing back the brilliance of the Gods with Maat, ⲙⲉⲉ/ⲙⲉ
"truth, justice", the cosmic and social order. This is an ideal line
of inquiry based on the pyramid texts in which we should distinguish influences
of dynastic Egypt from Megalithic fact.
[i]
The involvement of the Ionosphere in the process of power generation forms the
fundamental difference to a strictly geomantic structural foundation with local
amplification of electro-magnetic frequencies.