This section of the walling at the Temple of Karnak has for all intents been a mystery to us and not since observing and photographing it hereby. At the temple of Karnak, Luxor, the mystery of the place is one the locals at the site pertain to propagate on the contrary. This is not to say they are inheritors of those causing the partial destruction, and nor were more if any were actually offering for sale reference materials, description, histories or secondary depiction on the site of the temple grounds. This, tourist issue is exactly the problem I've referred to in the complacent approach to the ancient world. Can inheritors following a previous societies demise see a credible purpose in preserving and articulating the mysteries, or rather as mysteries are such-like and treasured for cosmetic purpose alone, even in deliberate defamation or sabotage?
This particular depiction of a boat being carried is one instance of archaic revival considerably more appropriate to archeology as anthropogeny. Indeed the image was enhanced to display the missing features which were torn proper. The pictograph being ripped down the middle on the temple walls was repaired here digitally applying symmetry where respectfully the symmetrical properties were whence destroyed:
Clearly the image bears resemblance to a monstrous face now similar to the expose of John Major Jenkins regarding the tomb lid of Pacal Votan. This matter (and watch this space) maybe better discerned by specialists in Meso-American art, writing and religion, but the case for a link from Ancient Egypt to the Americas would have to engage with Olmec at the time, and this cannot by any means be ruled out from possibility (and sequentially evident with Mayan & Aztec deities). In fact it may be a plausible matter to be addressed proper with evidence on case and point, and is under investigation.
The carrying of this boat seems to have been a matter most keenly distrusted where and assuredly most of the damage was deliberately caused. A scenario begins to emerge from history, and if not by Napoleon himself, thereby standing affront of the relief at Karnak, stabbing it hard with his rapier (at the pocket hole to the right of the main section) and demanding to know what its depicting. Why we should wonder were people carrying a boat across land, because whilst this was adamantly scrubbed off, it's still, quite clearly, humans underneath the boat, beside and on it, in either some act of reverence or reparation, or sanctification of their own variety. This is the conundrum besetting us now in recovery of this lore, of who were these humans so willing to walk the stones across Egypt to build the pyramid... and if not so, weren't these grandiose varieties the Annunaki too?
On site the suggestion of this very matter was raised in reference to the biblical ark of the covenant. A magical holding box to carry the commandments of Moses... That is (not sarcastically) hermeneutics is required once more to interpret this account in correlation with what's plain to see. One cannot argue that there are two giant figures directing the craft at both ends, and they are of immense stature compared to those around about it and carrying it. The fundamental and in continuity of what Laurence Gardener has claimed; the levitation of a stone block, a pillar and the building blocks of the ancient world seems evident whereby the entire craft is weightless and is being moved with gentle steering (the fan-like shape of the front for the wind, and the oar like bottom of the rear for the ground). That the blocks can be carried weightlessly is actually obvious here, and the reason for such insanity we would find besetting the denizens of modern Egypt, and to be the cause for royal disputes which ripped apart our modern world less than a century ago.
